Listen to Black Women!

Sign saying

Hey wait a second, I’m noticing a pattern here …

The Moment by Shireen Mitchell (aka @digitalsista) are both well worth listening to.   Shireen’s been calling attention to this for a while, and this Moment weaves together various threads and articles.  Nicole’s one of the leading voices for intersectional diversity, inclusion, justice, and equaity in the software industry, and the replies include her perspective as a Latinx woman as to why listening to black women is so important in this context. Safiya Umoya Noble’s recent Wired article Social Inequality Will Not Be Solved By an App is also well worth listening to, as is her outstanding book Algorithms of Oppression.

But what I especially want to highlight in this post is the overall theme.

Listen to Black women.

It’s good advice in the workplace.  It’s good advice professionally – collaborating with (and listening to) Shireen, Tammarrian Rogers, and Lynn Cyrin helped me raise my game and took our work on diversity-friendly software to a much higher level.  It’s good advice in politics and activism.  It’s good advice for protecting democracy.  It’s good advice in general.

Of course, I’m far from the first person to say this.  But a lot of white people, and a lot of guys, still act like they haven’t gotten the memo.

Fortunately, this is one of those rare pieces of advice that it’s very easy to act on.  Start by looking at your own behavior: are you hearing Black women’s voices?  Are you really listening to them?

Then get to work on to your friends, family, and colleagues.  Encourage them to listen; amplify Black women’s voices to make it easier for them.

It’s really not that hard.

Listen to Black women.

 


Image credit: Jeff Swensen, Getty Images, via Kiratiana Freelon’s March for Black Women Organizers Want to Put Our Issues Front and Center During March for Racial Justice on The Root

TechInclusion Seattle and Open Source Bridge: a diversity-in-tech twofer!

Two of my favorite conferences, in back-to-back weeks, make the Pacific Northwest the place to be for diversity and inclusion in technology this month.

Tech Inclusion Seattle - Driving an Inclusive Future

It kicks off with TechInclusion Seattle, June 14-15.  Here’s how I described TechInclusion SF late last year:

everything I look for in a conference experience: excellent content, outstanding networking, and a great mix of attendees — entrepreneurs, diversity and inclusion experts, policy people, executives, designers, engineers, marketers, investors, and hard-to-categorize people. The vibe was wonderful as well, positive with a sense of excitement, with the aid of remarkably good food and coffee.

Wayne Sutton, Melinda Briana Eppler, and the team at Change Catalysts do a great job organizing conferences, so unsurprisingly the agenda for the Seattle event features a similarly exciting mix of people: Saara Romu of the Gates Foundation, Jessica Eggert of Include Seattle, Tammarrian Rogers and Aurea Astro of Microsoft, Leslie Miley of Venture for America, Ellie Tumbuan of The Justice Collective, Andrew Mcgee of Greater, Surya Venka of and many others.   As if that’s not enough, this time the list of hard-to-categorize people includes … me!

I’ll be speaking about Diversity-friendly software and strategy on Wednesday, June 14, at 3 PM. * Just to drive home the point about how good the networking is at TechInclusion: one of the examples of diversity-friendly software I’ll be talking about is O.school, where I’m currently Tech DIVA (Technical Diversity, Inclusion, and Values Advisor).  And how did I connect with O.school?  By striking up a conversation with their CEO Andrea Barrica after a panel she was on at TechInclusion SF!

Open Source Bridge logo

 

Next comes Open Source Bridge, June 20-23 in Portland.  Here’s how I described it in If you enjoyed Tech Inclusion, you might also like …

Open Source Bridge (“the conference for Open Source Citizens”) is a 100% volunteer-run conference that’s been going strong since 2009 with a very strong diversity focus…. It’s more focused on development and design than some of the other conferences, with a lot of discussion of community organizing and the business of open source as well.

As always this year’s schedule looks amazing, starting with the keynotes: Nicole Sanchez on Tech Reform, Walé Ogundipé on Doing away with (bad) shibboleths (it’ll be really interesting to see how everybody pronounces the talk’s title), and Emily Gorcenski on Fake Science!  Sad! A case study of the perils of Open Data.  As a Mastodon fan, I’m also really looking forward to Federating with Trouble by the toot.cat admins; and the programming tools geek in me is very excited about my former MSR colleague Michael Ernst’s Create your own type system in 45 minutes.  It’s going to be a great conference, so if you’re in or near the software industry it’s worth checking out whether or not you’re into open source.

This year Open Source Bridge has added a track on activism – including my Thursday morning session Grassroots Activism is Hard.  Can Open Source Help?

Grassroots activists have to deal with many challenges — including the tools they’re using. Sounds like a great opportunity for open source! This session will survey progressive and transpartisan grassroots activists’ needs and today’s solutions (including techniques that work for explicitly intersectional groups), look at some existing open-source offerings and how they could evolve to better meet grassroots activists’ needs, and identify future directions that could be even more impactful.

A lot of diversity-in-tech and citizenship-in-open-source people live multiple lives, so if you’re also a grassroots activist, I’m very interested in hearing about the tools you’re using, what works, and what doesn’t.  Here’s a blog post with more information and a link to a survey.  And if you know somebody who’s involved in grassroots activism, especially with an intersectional focus, please pass the link along!

And while I’m making requests …

Open Source BridgeOpen Source Bridge is really is a grassroots all-volunteer effort, produced on a shoestring budget by the Stumptown Syndicate.   As they write in We need your help,

In order to cover the costs of producing a community conference, we rely largely on sponsorships. We haven’t been as fortunate this year in monetary recruiting and would love extra help in spreading the word about Open Source Bridge to your company or tech managers.

So those of you who are at tech companies in the Pacific Northwest, or within flying distance of Portland: as you’ll hear at my Tech Inclusion talk on Wednesday, investing in diversity-friendly software offers some significant technical advantages.  Sponsoring an event like Open Source Bridge is a great way to start connecting with the community, and giving one or more engineers or designers at your company a great chance to learn skills and make connections.  Please check out their sponsorship prospectus, and see if it makes sense for your company to sponsor!

 

* If you’re looking for a taste of what I’ll be talking about, you can check out the talk on Diversity-friendly software that Shireen Mitchell and I did at SXSW this March … or if wikis are your thing, here’s a session on Supporting diversity with a new approach to software Tammarrian and I did at Open Source Bridge last year.]

Lessons (so far) from Mastodon for independent social networks

Update, August 2018: This post was originally written in May 2017, and has only minor updates (fixing typos, adding a couple of additional links). Mastodon has continued to make progress, and I’m sure there are some new lessons to learn; so I added “(so far)” to the title.

April was an exciting month for Mastodon.  By the end of the month, the open-source, decentralized, social network (“Twitter without Nazis”) had grown to over 500,000 users, funding via Patreon for the lead developer and a part-time project manager, and corporate adoption.  The month had its challenges as well, of course.  14 Perspectives on a Breakthrough Month gives an overview of what happened.

Things have calmed down in May.  There’s a lot less media attention, and growth is slower.  The release process is getting more mature, with kanban boards and release candidates, and discussions in the Discourse forum as well as the Discord and Matrix chat rooms.  So now’s a great time to look at what we can learn from these experiences – for Mastodon and its future, and for other independent social networks as well.

A lot of these lessons aren’t new at all.  We’ve seen them before with Dreamwidth, Diaspora, StatusNet,  Gnu Social, Pinboard, Ello, and others. Mastodon’s a good reminder that they’re still true, so they’re worth reiterating here:

  • A lot of people want an alternative to corporate-owned ad-funded social networks.
  • Paying attention to marginalized communities is a great way to get critical mass and visibility.
  • A small team of developers can get something usable out quickly
  • There’s interest across the world, not just in the U.S.  Mastodon’s lead developer is German, the most active instances are based in Europe and Asia; France is the first government to have an instance; and initial corporate adoption came in Japan.
  • Decentralization makes things more complex

Moving on to some new lessons …

  1. Policies against racism, sexism, discrimination against gender and sexual minorities, and Nazis are extremely appealing positioning these days.  Not for everybody, of course: anti-safe-spacers, people with simplistic views of “free speech”, trolls, harassers and Nazis all have problems with it.   Still, there’s clearly a large underserved market who’s sick of the norms on Twitter, Reddit, Facebook,* and elsewhere.
  2. An explicit anti-harassment and pro-sexual-minority focus will attract a lot of people who are tired of the normalized harassment and heteronormativity on other social networks – enough to have a significant impact on the software.  Furries, LGBTQ+ people, and women have implemented the bulk of Mastodon’s functionality, and continue to help drive development going forward.
  3. A small team of developers can deliver real innovation when it comes to defenses against harassment.  Mastodon’s content warnings and instance-level blocking, while far from perfect, are both significant advances on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Reddit, an earlier open-source projects.  And this lesson directly relates to the previous one: it’s LGBTQ+ people who have advocated for and implemented much of this innovative functionality
  4. However, even with a stated anti-harassment focus it can still be challenging for a network to respond well when people are actually harassed.  In decentralized networks, communications between instances whose admins have different norms about the definitions of and appropriate reactions to harassment add a level of complexity.
  5. Even with an explicit anti-harassment, anti-fascism, and anti-racism focus, people of color are likely to be marginalized if the most influential people are white.  Other patterns that are likely to occur as well (as elsewhere online):
    – cis men are likely to prioritize anti-harassment functionality lower than women and gender-diverse people
    – harassment is more likely to be directed at women, people of color, and LGBTQ+ people.
    – impacts are likely to fall most heavily on women of color, and in particular queer women of color.
  6. Rapid growth will tend to dilute a LGBTQ+ focus, unless there’s an effort to keep LGBTQ+ people centered and give them real authority.  Allie Ward’s Mourning Mastodon and Mourning What Now?!?! posts make this case in detail.
  7. The existing “fediverse” is a two-edged sword for a social network with an anti-harassment and anti-racism focus.  While the fediverse shares the goal of building an alternative to corporate sites, many fediverse sites that describe themselves as “free speech zones” (and people who prefer those sites) are likely to disagree on some core issues including the definition of harassment.
  8. Instance-level federation choices are an important tool for sites that want to create a safer environment (although need to be complemented by user-level control and other functionality).  Given the range of different attitudes towards harassment (etc.), this is likely to lead to alliances of more-closely-linked groups of sites that share values, with relatively weak connections between the groups.
  9. There’s a lot more that can be done to counter harassment, Nazism, racism, sexism, transphobia, and other hate online. Mastodon’s current functionality only scratches the surface of what’s possible – and has generally been introduced in reaction to events in the network. By contrast, Andrea Barrica’s Ignoring Online Abuse is Bad for Business. Let’s Build Safer Spaces talks about O.school’s more proactive approach, and Transforming Tech with diversity-friendly software looks at Mastodon in a broader context.

It’s early days yet for Mastodon — it’s been around for less than a year — and no doubt there’s more to learn as well. It’ll be interesting to see how the software and the community evolve over time. Stay tuned!

Thanks to Creatrix Tiara, Thursday, and others for feedback on early drafts! 

* see Mark Zuckerberg Hates Black People for a good perspective on this

Update, June 26: Here’s the tootstream from my live-tooting the toot.cat admins’ Open Source Bridge presentation Federating with the Trouble, going into more detail based on their experiences.

Diversity-friendly software at SXSW 2017

Shireen Mitchell and I talked about Diversity-Friendly Software at SXSW 2017. Here’s the video

And here’s the slides.

http://www.slideshare.net/JonPincus1/diversityfriendly-software-sxsw-2017

We covered a lot! Here a list of references, along with some notes.

 

Anti-patterns

Best Practices

Diverse representation, inclusive culture, equitable policies

Setting intention

Accessibility

Flexible, optional, self-identification

Emerging techniques

Gender HCI

Threat modeling and harassment

Algorithmic Bias

Let's create a virtuous cycle!

Five software projects worth supporting

As the year wraps up, it’s a natural time to think about supporting worthwhile projects and organizations.  There are a lot of great non-profits working to make a difference in society, and in these challenging times it’s vital to support national groups like the Center for Media Justice, United We Dream, the Bill of Rights Defense Committee / Defending Dissent, the ACLU, and EFF.   It’s also important to support local organizations and small businesses; ask around to see who’s making an impact on the causes you care about.*

This list, though, has a somewhat different focus: software projects that I support — and hope you will too!  Some of these are non-profits, others are businesses (where the best way to support them is to pay for their products).  And keeping with the theme of this blog, all of them are very aware of diversity, whether or not it’s their primary focus.

Dreamwidth logoDreamwidth Studios is a community for all kinds of creative folk.  Yes, they have free accounts; but in a year where we’ve all seen first-hand the destructive effects of exploitative social networks we’re the users are the product, it’s worth putting down some money to support independent alternatives.   I talk a lot about Dreamwidth as a great example of a social network that really values diversity; it’s also a cool place to hang out!

Trans*H4CK logoTrans*H4ck creates technology for the trans and gender non conforming community by incubating projects, running hackathons, hosting online and in-person events, and being a hub for trans visibility in tech.  In 2017, Dr. Kortney Ziegler and the team are looking to launch local trans-focused spaces with their new Community H4CKters program.

hollaback! logoHollaback is a global movement to end harassment, and builds safe, inclusive public spaces by transforming the culture that perpetuates discrimination and violence.  Executive Director Projects include the Hollaback app for responding to street harassment, and the Heartmob platform for dealing with online harassment.

Thurst logoThurst is “the first dating app for queer people of all genders”.   Morgen Brommell’s outstanding AlterConf talk on Imagining Radical Queer Futures Through Tech is a great look at the possibilities of online spaces created by queer and trans people of color.After a promising beta test, Morgen’s currently working on security for a release in January 2017.  As well as donating, you can support the project by getting a cool t-shirt or tote bag!

Tor logoTor is free anonymity software, helping defend against traffic analysis and other kinds of online tracking as well as  circumventing censorship.  Tor’s vital for activists, whistleblowers, and journalists across the world. Tor has had some significant changes over the last 12 months including Shari Steele joining as executive director and new board members including Gabriella Coleman, Cindy Cohn, Matt Blaze, and Bruce Schneier.   It’s the first time I’ve given to the project – so a strong vote of confidence in the new direction!

 

* for example, if you’re in the San Francisco area and care about an activism-friendly nightlife space, consider supporting the DNA Lounge

Gender HCI, Feminist HCI, and Post-Colonial Computing

Emma Willard’s Temple of Time (1846)

Last major update, October 2018*

For years, I’ve asked software engineers and designers I run into at conference if they know about gender HCI (human-computer interaction), feminist HCI, or post-colonial computing. More recently, I’ve added intersectional HCI, anti-oppressive design, and design justice to the list as well. The response is usually something along the lines of “sounds interesting, but never heard of it.”

Which is a shame. These fields have some great insights about how to create software that works better for everybody. A very brief overview:

  • Gender HCI focuses on the differences in how different genders interact with computers
  • Feminist HCI is concerned with the design and evaluation of interactive systems that are imbued with sensitivity to the central commitments of feminism — agency, fulfillment, identity and the self, equity, empowerment, diversity, and social justice.
  • Post-colonial Computing centers on the questions of power, authority, legitimacy, participation, and intelligibility in the contexts of cultural encounter, particularly in the context of contemporary globalization
  • Intersectional HCI is a framework for engaging with the complexity of users’ and authors’ identities, and situating these identities in relation to their contextual surroundings.
  • Anti-oppressive design “considers both the values embedded in technological design and the environment that surrounds how a technology is built and researched.”
  • Design justice focuses on the ways that design reproduces, is reproduced by, and/or challenges the matrix of domination (white supremacy, heteropatriarchy, capitalism, and settler colonialism), and is also a growing social movement

At some level it’s not surprising that this work isn’t as well known as it should be. Much of this work has been done by women of color, queer and trans people, and others who are marginalized within the tech world. Much of this is heavily influenced by the social sciences, which are also marginalized by tech. And much of this work is also by the kinds of biases against that anti-oppressive research that Alex Ahmed, Judeth Oden Choi, Teresa Almeida, Kelly Ireland, and I discuss in What’s at Issue: Sex, Stigma, and Politics in ACM Publishing.**

So here are some slightly longer overviews of these different areas, each featuring a handful of key papers, along with a few videos. As you read this, Like any literature survey, what’s here is filtered through my background and interests; if there’s other work that you think should be here, please let me know!

Continue reading Gender HCI, Feminist HCI, and Post-Colonial Computing