Intersectionality: definitions, videos, and links

“Intersectionality” is a concept that a lot of people – including me, when I first heard it – find challenging to really understand.

The definition is actually fairly straightforward.  Merriam-Webster has a very pithy version:

when forms of discrimination combine, overlap, and intersect

Here’s what Wikipedia says:

Intersectionality is a term coined by American civil rights advocate Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw to describe overlapping or intersecting social identities and related systems of oppression, domination, or discrimination. Intersectionality is the idea that multiple identities intersect to create a whole that is different from the component identities.

And M-W’s Words We’re Watching page has a short history of the word

The term was coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in a 1989 essay that asserts that antidiscrimination law, feminist theory, and antiracist politics all fail to address the experiences of black women because of how they each focus on only a single factor. Crenshaw writes that “[b]ecause the intersectional experience is greater than the sum of racism and sexism, any analysis that does not take intersectionality into account cannot sufficiently address the particular manner in which Black women are subordinated.”

Though originally applied only to the ways that sexism and racism combine and overlap, intersectionality has come to include other forms of discrimination as well, such as those based on class, sexuality, and ability.

Indeed.

Still, even once you know the definition, the concept itself is subtle and complex, and the implications are very far-ranging.  If you want to understand it better, you really need to dig into it.  So here are some videos and links.

There’s lots of other good stuff out there as well … if you have some favorite links, feel free to share them!

A stick figure, with arrows pointing to it saying race, education, sexuality, ability, age, gender, ethnicity, culture, language, and class
Image source: All Booked Up

Intersectional Inclusion: Perspectives from the Resistance Manual

Resistance Manual - A Project by Stay Woke

One of the topics in my upcoming Open Source Bridge presentation Grassroots Activism is Hard.  Can Open Source Help? is

Highlight techniques from projects like Resistance Manual that take an explicitly intersectional focus

You can see the work-in-progress list of techniques on the OSBridge wiki.  This post focuses specifically on the Resistance Manual.

Continue reading Intersectional Inclusion: Perspectives from the Resistance Manual

TechInclusion Seattle and Open Source Bridge: a diversity-in-tech twofer!

Two of my favorite conferences, in back-to-back weeks, make the Pacific Northwest the place to be for diversity and inclusion in technology this month.

Tech Inclusion Seattle - Driving an Inclusive Future

It kicks off with TechInclusion Seattle, June 14-15.  Here’s how I described TechInclusion SF late last year:

everything I look for in a conference experience: excellent content, outstanding networking, and a great mix of attendees — entrepreneurs, diversity and inclusion experts, policy people, executives, designers, engineers, marketers, investors, and hard-to-categorize people. The vibe was wonderful as well, positive with a sense of excitement, with the aid of remarkably good food and coffee.

Wayne Sutton, Melinda Briana Eppler, and the team at Change Catalysts do a great job organizing conferences, so unsurprisingly the agenda for the Seattle event features a similarly exciting mix of people: Saara Romu of the Gates Foundation, Jessica Eggert of Include Seattle, Tammarrian Rogers and Aurea Astro of Microsoft, Leslie Miley of Venture for America, Ellie Tumbuan of The Justice Collective, Andrew Mcgee of Greater, Surya Venka of and many others.   As if that’s not enough, this time the list of hard-to-categorize people includes … me!

I’ll be speaking about Diversity-friendly software and strategy on Wednesday, June 14, at 3 PM. * Just to drive home the point about how good the networking is at TechInclusion: one of the examples of diversity-friendly software I’ll be talking about is O.school, where I’m currently Tech DIVA (Technical Diversity, Inclusion, and Values Advisor).  And how did I connect with O.school?  By striking up a conversation with their CEO Andrea Barrica after a panel she was on at TechInclusion SF!

Open Source Bridge logo

 

Next comes Open Source Bridge, June 20-23 in Portland.  Here’s how I described it in If you enjoyed Tech Inclusion, you might also like …

Open Source Bridge (“the conference for Open Source Citizens”) is a 100% volunteer-run conference that’s been going strong since 2009 with a very strong diversity focus…. It’s more focused on development and design than some of the other conferences, with a lot of discussion of community organizing and the business of open source as well.

As always this year’s schedule looks amazing, starting with the keynotes: Nicole Sanchez on Tech Reform, Walé Ogundipé on Doing away with (bad) shibboleths (it’ll be really interesting to see how everybody pronounces the talk’s title), and Emily Gorcenski on Fake Science!  Sad! A case study of the perils of Open Data.  As a Mastodon fan, I’m also really looking forward to Federating with Trouble by the toot.cat admins; and the programming tools geek in me is very excited about my former MSR colleague Michael Ernst’s Create your own type system in 45 minutes.  It’s going to be a great conference, so if you’re in or near the software industry it’s worth checking out whether or not you’re into open source.

This year Open Source Bridge has added a track on activism – including my Thursday morning session Grassroots Activism is Hard.  Can Open Source Help?

Grassroots activists have to deal with many challenges — including the tools they’re using. Sounds like a great opportunity for open source! This session will survey progressive and transpartisan grassroots activists’ needs and today’s solutions (including techniques that work for explicitly intersectional groups), look at some existing open-source offerings and how they could evolve to better meet grassroots activists’ needs, and identify future directions that could be even more impactful.

A lot of diversity-in-tech and citizenship-in-open-source people live multiple lives, so if you’re also a grassroots activist, I’m very interested in hearing about the tools you’re using, what works, and what doesn’t.  Here’s a blog post with more information and a link to a survey.  And if you know somebody who’s involved in grassroots activism, especially with an intersectional focus, please pass the link along!

And while I’m making requests …

Open Source BridgeOpen Source Bridge is really is a grassroots all-volunteer effort, produced on a shoestring budget by the Stumptown Syndicate.   As they write in We need your help,

In order to cover the costs of producing a community conference, we rely largely on sponsorships. We haven’t been as fortunate this year in monetary recruiting and would love extra help in spreading the word about Open Source Bridge to your company or tech managers.

So those of you who are at tech companies in the Pacific Northwest, or within flying distance of Portland: as you’ll hear at my Tech Inclusion talk on Wednesday, investing in diversity-friendly software offers some significant technical advantages.  Sponsoring an event like Open Source Bridge is a great way to start connecting with the community, and giving one or more engineers or designers at your company a great chance to learn skills and make connections.  Please check out their sponsorship prospectus, and see if it makes sense for your company to sponsor!

 

* If you’re looking for a taste of what I’ll be talking about, you can check out the talk on Diversity-friendly software that Shireen Mitchell and I did at SXSW this March … or if wikis are your thing, here’s a session on Supporting diversity with a new approach to software Tammarrian and I did at Open Source Bridge last year.]

Lessons (so far) from Mastodon for independent social networks

Update, August 2018: This post was originally written in May 2017, and has only minor updates (fixing typos, adding a couple of additional links). Mastodon has continued to make progress, and I’m sure there are some new lessons to learn; so I added “(so far)” to the title.

April was an exciting month for Mastodon.  By the end of the month, the open-source, decentralized, social network (“Twitter without Nazis”) had grown to over 500,000 users, funding via Patreon for the lead developer and a part-time project manager, and corporate adoption.  The month had its challenges as well, of course.  14 Perspectives on a Breakthrough Month gives an overview of what happened.

Things have calmed down in May.  There’s a lot less media attention, and growth is slower.  The release process is getting more mature, with kanban boards and release candidates, and discussions in the Discourse forum as well as the Discord and Matrix chat rooms.  So now’s a great time to look at what we can learn from these experiences – for Mastodon and its future, and for other independent social networks as well.

A lot of these lessons aren’t new at all.  We’ve seen them before with Dreamwidth, Diaspora, StatusNet,  Gnu Social, Pinboard, Ello, and others. Mastodon’s a good reminder that they’re still true, so they’re worth reiterating here:

  • A lot of people want an alternative to corporate-owned ad-funded social networks.
  • Paying attention to marginalized communities is a great way to get critical mass and visibility.
  • A small team of developers can get something usable out quickly
  • There’s interest across the world, not just in the U.S.  Mastodon’s lead developer is German, the most active instances are based in Europe and Asia; France is the first government to have an instance; and initial corporate adoption came in Japan.
  • Decentralization makes things more complex

Moving on to some new lessons …

  1. Policies against racism, sexism, discrimination against gender and sexual minorities, and Nazis are extremely appealing positioning these days.  Not for everybody, of course: anti-safe-spacers, people with simplistic views of “free speech”, trolls, harassers and Nazis all have problems with it.   Still, there’s clearly a large underserved market who’s sick of the norms on Twitter, Reddit, Facebook,* and elsewhere.
  2. An explicit anti-harassment and pro-sexual-minority focus will attract a lot of people who are tired of the normalized harassment and heteronormativity on other social networks – enough to have a significant impact on the software.  Furries, LGBTQ+ people, and women have implemented the bulk of Mastodon’s functionality, and continue to help drive development going forward.
  3. A small team of developers can deliver real innovation when it comes to defenses against harassment.  Mastodon’s content warnings and instance-level blocking, while far from perfect, are both significant advances on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Reddit, an earlier open-source projects.  And this lesson directly relates to the previous one: it’s LGBTQ+ people who have advocated for and implemented much of this innovative functionality
  4. However, even with a stated anti-harassment focus it can still be challenging for a network to respond well when people are actually harassed.  In decentralized networks, communications between instances whose admins have different norms about the definitions of and appropriate reactions to harassment add a level of complexity.
  5. Even with an explicit anti-harassment, anti-fascism, and anti-racism focus, people of color are likely to be marginalized if the most influential people are white.  Other patterns that are likely to occur as well (as elsewhere online):
    – cis men are likely to prioritize anti-harassment functionality lower than women and gender-diverse people
    – harassment is more likely to be directed at women, people of color, and LGBTQ+ people.
    – impacts are likely to fall most heavily on women of color, and in particular queer women of color.
  6. Rapid growth will tend to dilute a LGBTQ+ focus, unless there’s an effort to keep LGBTQ+ people centered and give them real authority.  Allie Ward’s Mourning Mastodon and Mourning What Now?!?! posts make this case in detail.
  7. The existing “fediverse” is a two-edged sword for a social network with an anti-harassment and anti-racism focus.  While the fediverse shares the goal of building an alternative to corporate sites, many fediverse sites that describe themselves as “free speech zones” (and people who prefer those sites) are likely to disagree on some core issues including the definition of harassment.
  8. Instance-level federation choices are an important tool for sites that want to create a safer environment (although need to be complemented by user-level control and other functionality).  Given the range of different attitudes towards harassment (etc.), this is likely to lead to alliances of more-closely-linked groups of sites that share values, with relatively weak connections between the groups.
  9. There’s a lot more that can be done to counter harassment, Nazism, racism, sexism, transphobia, and other hate online. Mastodon’s current functionality only scratches the surface of what’s possible – and has generally been introduced in reaction to events in the network. By contrast, Andrea Barrica’s Ignoring Online Abuse is Bad for Business. Let’s Build Safer Spaces talks about O.school’s more proactive approach, and Transforming Tech with diversity-friendly software looks at Mastodon in a broader context.

It’s early days yet for Mastodon — it’s been around for less than a year — and no doubt there’s more to learn as well. It’ll be interesting to see how the software and the community evolve over time. Stay tuned!

Thanks to Creatrix Tiara, Thursday, and others for feedback on early drafts! 

* see Mark Zuckerberg Hates Black People for a good perspective on this

Update, June 26: Here’s the tootstream from my live-tooting the toot.cat admins’ Open Source Bridge presentation Federating with the Trouble, going into more detail based on their experiences.

Mastodon: 14 perspectives on a breakthrough month

April was a big month for Mastodon, the open-source, decentralized, ad-free Twitter alternative.   As lead developer Eugen Rochko says

Twitter changed the reply system, which everybody told them they shouldn’t do, and then removed the iconic egg avatar for new users, and suddenly all of my work of telling people that one day Twitter would do something they didn’t like and they’d need a viable alternative paid off.

Yeah really!  By the end of the month, Mastodon had grown to over  500,000 users, over 1,000 instances, hundreds of contributors to the code base, and funding for a developer and project manager.  Exciting times!

Of course, rapid growth can cause challenges as well.   Can Mastodon keep its anti-harassment, pro-furry, pro-LGBTQ+, anti-Nazi focus as it grows?  What to do about content that’s acceptable by some instances but illegal elsewhere?  Is the influx of new people who don’t understand the network’s culture the start of an “Eternal April”, like Usenet’s Eternal September?*

There’s certainly a lot to learn from this last month.  Before sharing my own thoughts, I wanted to start with a bunch of other perspectives I found very useful.  These are organized mostly-chronologically, so you can get a sense of how the month played out – although I put Eugen’s April Post-Mortem at the end, to give him the last word.

@sarahjeong@mastodon.socialMastodon Is Like Twitter Without Nazis, So Why Are We Not Using It? by Sarah Jeong in Motherboard (April 4), describes her experiences in late March and early April just as things started to heat up. Her summary of the culture: “it’s really more of an LGBTQ-oriented space, one with a lot of anime avatars and a lot of furries.”   Her conclusion: “And judging by the chatter on the federated timeline, a lot of people have found a home here. Mastodon, I think, is here to stay.”

@qinaliu@mastodon.socialWhat I wish I knew before joining Mastodon, by Qina Liu on HackerNoon (April 9), uses Harry Potter gifs as part of an excellent getting-started guide. Since then, Mastodon has implemented some onboarding screens that should help new people, and introduced new functionality as well, but most of what’s here is still very relevant.

@sargoth@mastodon.socialMastodon, pineapples, social media and other unanswered questions, by Johanna Drott (April 9), captures the sense of possibilities — and the challenging questions. “What is interesting is that the sense of early 90s cyberoptimism has started to reappear. It is possible to do things again, to change things, to build things that will make a difference…. What can and ought we do to establish sustainable social norms? How do we live together without breaking one another?”

@jdp23@toot.catTransforming Tech with Diversity-Friendly Software, by me, from a presentation on April 13 at TRANSform Tech, includes a look at Mastodon’s early membership (gay communist furries, LGBTQ+ people), attention to harrasment, early significant advances over the state of the art like content warnings.

@sarahjeong@mastodon.socialFrom Witches to Dolphins, These Are the Communities That Make Mastodon Great by Sarah Jeong in Motherboard (April 14), looks at “the top five instances of Mastodon, according to me, as judged by completely meaningless criteria that I refuse to disclose”: mstdn.jp, kirakiratter.com, botsin.space, oulipo.social (which prohibits “that fifth symbol, or any variant of it, that is found in Latin script, including using “3” or homographic symbols in its spot”) and dolphin.town (“the e’s have to go somewhere”).

@dredmorbius@mastodon.cloudThe Normal Invasion (April 16–17), an epic tootstorm by @dredmorbius@mastodon.cloud, suggests that Mastodon’s initial quirkiness and welcoming to certain non-mainstream communities will inevitably be lost as the community grows.

What No One Else Has Told You About Mastodon, by Ryan Parreno (April 17), discusses the challenges of getting discovered and gentrification. “If you poke into the site now, you may not recognize it but the older users are fighting for control over the community from the newbies. Will gay-friendly Mastodon survive? Or can we build a better community in its place?”

@eileenb@mastodon.cloudIs Mastodon the new social media star, or imploding black hole?, by Eileen Brown on ZDNet (April 17), looks at the current status of Mastodon and the “fediverse”, and concludes that while Twitter and Facebook don’t need to worry about their ad revenue, Mastodon isn’t going away. “In the last seven days I have had more meaningful interactions with my few Mastodon followers there than I have over the last year with the passive followers I have on Twitter.”

The graph of the fediverse — Liaizon Wakest. Mastodon is the lower left structure.

@amaelle_g@mastdn.frMastodon : un autre Twitter est possible (in French) by Amaelle Guiton in Libération, on April 19 looks at the reality, challenges, and possibilities as of mid-April, with excellent observations from Cthulhu 2017, suggesting that it’s off to a more promising start than other alternative social networks like Diaspora*, and Corentin on communities around values.

@u2764@icosahedron.websiteMourning Mastodon and Mourning What Now? by Allie Hart (April 22–23) look in more depth at the power structure and ways in which queer people are increasingly being marginalized (as well as other diversity isssues). “Had Mastodon given queer contributors the ability to make executive decisions regarding the project, the community could have reached a place where it was no longer in peril.”

Tomio Shimizupixivのマストドン参入の理由と可能性についてPawooプロダクトマネージャーが語る — ログミー (Pixiv’s Pawoo Person Speaks) (in Japanese), on Logmi (April 25), a transcription of a talk by Tomio Shimizu of Pawoo.net, discusses what Pixiv is planning on doing with its Mastodon integration. Matthew Skala’s Mastodon WTF Timeline (in English) has some useful background on this.

@NinahMarie@social.tchncs.deThe Bits and Bytes of Mastodon (in Dutch), by Ninah Marie on De Weg Naar, (April 25), looks at the network as sparking a “giant international multicultural chatbox”, has a great set tips and tricks, and in a postscript talks about how professionals might use Mastodon.

Laure Lucchesi >Laure Lucchesi : “Nous voulons tenter l’aventure du réseau social Mastodon”(in French), Acteurs publics (April 28): an interview with the director of the French government agency Etalab discssing why they’ve set up a Mastodon instance for French government employees.

@Gargron@mastodon.socialApril Post-Mortem, by Mastodon lead developer Eugen Rochko (April 25) looks at the month and the current state of Mastodon.

There was plenty of other good stuff written as well, but these should be enough to get you started.

Coming soon: Lessons from #EternalApril


* I first heard the term “Eternal April” from Roza Shanina.  Kit Redgrave and gravity conscious orb both used it early the month; and no doubt others have as well.

Grassroots activism and open source – coming soon, at Open Source Bridge!

Open Source Bridge logow00t! I’m delighted to announce that my proposal for a Open Source Bridge session on Grassroots activism is hard. Can open source help? has been accepted! Thanks to Aditi Juneja, Harry Waisbren, and Chris Benson for the feedback on earlier versions.

Here’s the abstract:

Grassroots activists have to deal with many challenges — including the tools they’re using. Sounds like a great opportunity for open source! This session will survey progressive and transpartisan grassroots activists’ needs and today’s solutions (including techniques that work for explicitly intersectional groups), look at some existing open-source offerings and how they could evolve to better meet grassroots activists’ needs, and identify future directions that could be even more impactful.

You can read the whole proposal here.

Open Source Bridge is “the conference for open source citizens”, and one one of my favorite conferences. There are lots of other great proposals  (I’m especially looking forward to the one on Federating with Trouble by the toot.cat admins),  so by all means check out, if you’re interested in open source software or diversity in technology. The conference is from June 20–23; session my tentatively scheduled for Thursday, June 22 at 10 a.m..

Between now and then, I’ll be surveying the landscape today — and documenting details on the wiki (an approach that worked extremely well for the session Tammarrian Rogers and I did last year on Supporting Diversity with a New Approach to Software). For example:

  • Describe grassroots activist groups’ typical needs
  • Look at the kinds of solutions in use today
  • Highlight techniques from projects like Resistance Manual that take an explicitly intersectional focus
  • Look at some existing open-source offerings, how they can help today, and how they could evolve to better meet grassroots activists’ needs

If you’ve got any thoughts on those, please share — here, on Twitter, or on Mastodon, where I’m @jdp23@toot.cat!